Wednesday, 20 May 2015

Old boy reception

Cult reception




Complex narrative
The narrative is quite complicated, with lots of characters, plot twists and flashbacks to the past.

Octopus symbolism
The octopus scene shows that oh needs to eat something alive to feel alive, therefore he orders the live octopus and eats it

Powerful film- depths of the human heart


Age consent
The age of consent was changed , so in the remake, oh is trapped in the hotel room for 20 years, instead of 15 because of the age of consent


Negative western reception
The film was dumbed down for the western audience because they were worried that the controversial subject matter would alienate western fans.

Harming animals-
Octopus eating is culturally okay in Korea 

Sadomasochism

Puerile

Doesn't not reach the standards of a puritanical minority

Age consent

Style over substance

Adolescent target/audience


Hollywood remake receptions

CHN- less morally amibigous ending
Commodities morals (capitalistic greed
Alignment
Hammer scene
Ending

Thursday, 14 May 2015

How can certain types of film affect viewing experiences?

Paragraph 1
Three certain types of films: Intellectual, Provocative, Throwaway.  Example of reception theory

. Intellectual film will challenge the spectator, dealing with important and complex subjects that need full attention. 
. A provocative film will create a reaction to the spectator, for example shock or anger in order to convey a message.
. A throwaway film is a film that relies largely on spectacle and visual imagery to entertain the spectator, there is not much to think.

The viewing experience for a spectator differs in three different types of readings

. Preferred Reading- accepting the messages conveyed in the film and agreeing with how the film is presented (etc, aligning with the characters, engaging with the narrative)

. Negotiated Reading- the viewer accepts the messages encoded into the film but does not engage fully with the film as a whole. 

. Oppositional Reading- the viewer doesn't agree with the film's message or meaning and engages with the film via a different interpretation. 



Wednesday, 22 April 2015

How would a black spectator react to Django Unchained?

How would a black spectator react to Django Unchained?

Django Unchained is a spaghetti western film set in Texas during the slave trade. It is directed by Quentin Tarantino and features Jamie Foxx as the eponymous Django, a former slave who now works as a bounty hunter, who is also looking to free his wife Broomhilda who is a slave. In terms of spectatorship, the film is set in a stylised post modern past which combines the horrors of slavery with the fantasy like nature of spaghetti western genre in a black comedy style. The film has been criticised for its treatment of racism and slavery.

In terms of how a black male spectator would react to the film, the film has been criticised for its depiction of slavery. Spike Lee, a black male film maker criticised the film saying it was 'disrespectful' and that ''american slavery was a holocaust, not a Sergio Leone spaghetti western'' In Django Unchained, the most prominent black character is Django. However since Django is playing the main character of a western, he is a character motivated by vengeance and the want to free Broomhilda, he doesn't care for the other slaves. There is no type of brotherhood or companionship, especially in the scene where Django pretends to be a black slaver where he treats them even worse than the other white slavers. It could be argued that Django is playing a white person's role in the film since he lacks any sympathy for the slaves. Django's only intention is to free his wife and he does this by killing dozens of white men and slavers. Django's actions are not intentional but symbolic of freedom over slavery. Another main black character in the film is Stephen, the house slave, which is an even more exaggerated example of a white villain character played by a slave. Stephen antagonises Django the instant they meet indicating the lack of brotherhood or familiarity despite the racism occurring in the film. In terms of representation, if the role of black men in the film is played by white character roles from a spaghetti western, there is little for the black male to identify with themselves in the film. They can't identify with Django because he has no sympathy for the slaves, as is the same with Stephen.

Bell hooks oppositional gaze of films when it comes to black male spectator is that as a rebellious gaze, the black male would watch a film so they can look at white women with a imaginary phallocentric power over the cinema, similar to Mulvey's male gaze. By applying this to Django, there is almost no sexual content in the film so bell hook's theory doesn't apply. However considering that bell hooks theory of a rebellious gaze stems from the idea of black being punished for gazing at white women, the films theme of revenge against white men with dozens of white men killed by Django, this could be the rebellious action that appeals to the black male spectator as part of bell hooks's theory about the gaze.

In terms of how a black female spectator would react to the film, the main female character film is Broomhilda, Django's wife. Broomhilda plays essentially the damsel in distress, as a character role. Her purpose in the film is to be rescued by Django and she seems weak and vulnerable. When she sees Django for the first time, she faints. She is unable to lie to Stephen as she is nervous and she is locked away by the slavers after Django shoots up Candieland. Broomhilda is playing the stereotypical damsel in distress, and also shows signs of her playing a white character role in the typical spaghetti western type role, for example, speaking german.

Applying bell hook's theory to Django in terms of black female spectator is that bell hook's believes that black women are not represented and that black women are aware of a lack of black womanhood in film. She writes that black women are used to enhance and maintain white women as object of the phallocentric gaze and that cinema is not a pleasurable experience for the black women . Bell hooks states that in order for a black female spectator to enjoy a film, black females must view films with a oppositional and critical gaze. This is how black female spectators have a rebellious gaze by an almost interrogation like attitude towards the film. Applying this to Django and the character of Broomhilda, the black female will probably not identify with Broomhilda who is largely unseen for the majority of the film and is shown as a weak, vulnerable damsel in distress. However, Broomhilda is seen in the film
as the only desirable woman in the film by Django and Dr King Schultz, who literally slams the door in
the face of Calvin Candie's white sister mid conversation with him. This means that Broomhilda is not
represented to enhance and maintain white woman, it is instead the opposite. Another scene that indicates Broomhilda is the only desirable women in Django's eyes is that he keeps fantasising about her during the film, where she appears behind trees or in the water when Django is washing. This type of critical and analytical view of the film is demonstrative of bell hook's theory about the black female spectator and how they enjoy the film.

In conclusion, a black spectator would find Django Unchained a difficult film to initially identify with. The film's genre is a western and all the black characters in the film are playing the white character roles of a western. There is nothing in these characters specifically aimed at the black spectator to align with. Instead if the film is read from a symbolic level, with Django killing dozens of white slavers and Broomhilda the only desirable women in the film rather than any of the white women, it allows the black spectator to identify with them.


Tuesday, 24 March 2015

Essay plan brokeback mountain

Plan essay for how will different audiences react to brokeback mountain.

How would different audiences respond to brokeback mountain

Introduction
 
Depends on sexuality, homosexuals spectator more likely to be aligned, heterosexual spectators may struggle to relate to the film.

Butler
Butler says gender is a performance, a social construct in the mind in the way you act, talk and dress, not something you are instantly born with.
Brokeback mountain shows two men struggling with their hypermasculine roles as Cowboys with families. Although they are both homosexual inside.- closeted.- when Ennis has sex with his wife from behind after his relationship with Jack.
Jack is the feminine one in the relationship, Ennis is the masculine.
Jacks wife is more manly than him- has reversed gender roles

Homosexual spectator would align with Jack, since even though he can't openly express his homosexuality due to the society of the films time period, he is much more comfortable with his homosexuality and femininity than Ennis. Heterosexual spectator is more likely to align with Ennis because Ennis gender role in his head is that he is a masculine straight man which they can align with but his relationship with Jack obviously changes this and causes inner conflict for Ennis. 
I'm not a queer y know example

Rucus
Rucus says that a homosexual spectator has to adopt the position of a woman in a film to get any pleasure from it. 
Examples
Binoculars looking at Jack and Ennis wrestling- literal voyuerism
Naked showering but Jack is out of focus and Ennis isn't looking at him, the men aren't sexually objectified
Jack is feminine in relationship- loud, playful, wrestling, more emotional- reflected in his later marriage
Ennis is masculine- quiet, detached, aggressive, - when angered, lashes out, - Jack, man who calls him an asshole when he crosses the street, his wife

Homosexual spectator may not align with the film as much as they would if they viewed the film from a queer gaze perspective. They can still get pleasure from the film by empathising with the homosexual relationship from their own personal experiences. Instead, a heterosexual male spectator may find that they align with Ennis since they may find they have similar personalities to him. A female heterosexual spectator may identify with Jack in the same way.'







Tuesday, 3 March 2015

Apply Judith Butler and Derek Rucus

Apply Judith Butler and Derek Rucus to 500 days of summer.


Judith Butler says that gender is a performance constructed and reinforced through media and culture. It doesnt matter about your physical differences gender wise, its about how you think and the way you act. Applying these to 500 days of summer shows that the two characters of the film, Tom and Summer have subverted gender roles. Tom is quite feminine whereas Summer is quite masculine. However Butler would argue that the two gender roles in a relationship have not been subverted but just attached to opposite genders since her theory suggests that gender is a performance construct.

Derek Rucus says that a gay male spectator can only derive scopophilic pleasure from men. If applied into 500 days of summer, an example would be when Tom looks over the cubicle to see Summer. He is looking directly at the gay male spectator with a romantic gaze. Another example is the bus scene where they all look at Summer and her measurements

Queer Theory/Gender

Queer theory challenges

Judith Butler- apply her theories to spectatorship.

Male and female behaviour roles are not the result of biology but are constructed and reinforced by society through media and culture.

500 days of summer
men might not align with Tom because he is playing to feminine gender role. they may not align with Summer because she plays to masculine gender role.

Any behaviour or representation that disrupts culturally accepted notions of gender.

1950's- police actively enforced laws that prohibited sexual activities between men.
.  Sexually abnormal and deviant
1967- homosexuality is decriminalising in UK (2009 for India)
In parts of Africa and Asia. homosexuality is punishable by death.
.1977- WHO refers to homosexuality as a mental illness and not taken down until 1990.
.Civil partnership legal in UK in 2004.


Brokeback Mountain (2006)

Success of this hollywood film is an indication of more progressive attitudes to homosexuality.
The film challenges two quintessential traditional images of american masculinity- the cowboy and the fishing trip.
However, it can also be suggested that the homosexual relationship portrayed here is represented as tragic- a long way from the idealised heterosexual relationships in mainstream Hollywood films.
As the film is set in the 1950's, some would also argue that this suggests issues of homophobia belong in the past.

Gender trouble is evident everywhere in mainstream media.
Queer theorists suggest this is evidence of a move towards increasing tolerance of sexual diversity.

When a gay personal watches a homosexual film, it brings a much more emotionally charged element to the spectator. It is the emotion of empathy because of coming out and breaking out of the sexual norm. The gay audience have allegiance  to the empathetic character.



Theorists Notes

Kaplan

. Kaplan argues that the spectator aligns with the male in film. She argues that the spectator must make a conscious decision to align with the female in film.
. This theory therefore can link to my previous point, as the spectator wants to align with Summer, he/she must make a conscious decision to do so.
. For example, one may align with Summer consciously as she does not gain a voice, however if we only view the film through the subconscious male gaze, the spectator may not align with Summer, as the audience cannot hear her perspective.
. One may adapt to a negotiated reading of the film; if the spectator is not white, male and straight.
. If the audience take a conscious decision to take a woman's perspective, then the reading of the film is negotiated.

Mulvey

. Based upon the theories of Freud, Bellour and Metz, Laura Mulvey focuses on the male gaze and how women are the subject of the film, only there for visual pleasure.
. Summer is introduced through close ups of her body: the narrator describes her average height etc, making her an object of viewing pleasure only. The narrator goes on to explain ''The Summer effect'' in which displays of voyeurism are presented. Example is the bus scene. An allegiance may be formed with Summer and the female spectator.
.When Tom has sex with Summer for the first time, the next morning he breaks out into a dance sequence in the middle of the street. Although this is a comical part of the film, it displays the male gaze on a large scale, a large celebration of Tom conquering Summer with his penis, making Summer the subject and Tom regains his masculinity.
. Male spectators would feel allegiance with Tom due to the fact he has gained a sense of power over the women, confirming to the stereotypical Hollywood film.

Williams

The female gaze becomes the dominant gaze, the strong female character is usually punished and there is a struggle to align with them, because of their break out of the conventional role. This isn't applicable to 500 day's of summer. In the film, Summer is strong, independent and isn't intentionally looking for a relationship. She doesn't get diagetically punished but she gets punished in terms of spectator response. The scene where she talks about her past lovers shows she is dominating him sexually, as well as the conversation. So diagetically, Tom is punished because Summer gets married to another man and he ends up depressed. For example, the scene where he criticises her appearance in the same way he complimented her appearance earlier in the film. At the end of the film, the day counter resets to zero when Tom meets Autumn, which could indicate the cycle of punishment is going to happen again.